PSoTD

Tuesday November 30, 2004 at 4:06pm

That Season

Yep, that's The Heat Miser.

And yep, it's officially that season - the season you cannot turn your television on without running into Christmas shows of past and present.

So who's your favorite Christmas villain? C'mon, everyone has one. I kinda like the Misers.

Tuesday November 30, 2004 at 12:49pm

DKSE0405

For regular visitors of Daily Kos,
there's an explanation here.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday November 30, 2004 at 12:49pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday November 30, 2004 at 10:02am

Outta Town Money Versus The State Flag

I think we all know which side of this issue history will finally adopt.

In 2001, there was a vote in Mississippi about whether to keep the Southern Cross on the State Flag. Vote to keep flag prevailed 64 percent on 2001 ballot. Since then, Mississippi's economy has paid a price.

From the
Clarion-Ledger:
When the Mississippi flag forced a university's basketball tournament to be relocated earlier this month, Jackson's top convention promoter had a flashback.

"I thought, 'Oh God, not again,' " said Wanda Wilson, executive director of the Jackson Convention and Visitors Bureau.

...

Because of the flag, Mississippi State University had to open its men's basketball season on Nov. 11 in Alabama — instead of as a tournament host. The National Collegiate Athletic Association forbids planned tournaments in Mississippi and South Carolina because of the Southern Cross.

So how much is this flag costing Mississippi? Hard to say, but...
After the new flag was defeated in 2001, the International Association of Black Professional Firefighters and the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity canceled planned conventions in Jackson.

The convention and visitors bureau reported 666 conventions brought 107,535 convention delegates to Jackson in fiscal year 2003, and 382 conventions have brought 118,205 people this year. In the two years combined, those delegates have spent an estimated $76 million in Jackson.

There seems to be some economic impact. The NCAA says their policy will continue into the "foreseeable future". How long until the money talks so loudly it cannot be ignored any longer?

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday November 30, 2004 at 10:02am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Monday November 29, 2004 at 10:58am

Added to Blogroll...

Get an eyeful of
Covington.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday November 29, 2004 at 10:58am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Monday November 29, 2004 at 7:13am

Controversial? Not in American Reporting...

Just something I've noticed - when you do a word search on Google News for the term

"controversial"

You will get news services primarily outside of the United States. It is as if the term is forbidden from use in U.S. newspapers.
See for yourself.

How can they report on controversies, as controversies, if they won't use the word?

A followup: There seems to be no shortage of American Bloggers using the term "controversial". The use of the word "controversial" provides an implication there are two sides of the story - and perhaps two relatively equal sides of the story. Why is it that American reporting doesn't appear to like using the term, yet bloggers do? Lots of possibilities:

1. Use of term seen as "worn", and due to that, not really "journalistic". Of course, the European papers use the term all the time, so that seems unlikely.

2. It's too big of a word for American newspaper readers.

3. American readers don't like stories with two views.

4. American newspapers don't like stories with two views.

What else?
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday November 29, 2004 at 7:13am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Sunday November 28, 2004 at 7:49pm

Just when you thought Christmas couldn't be any more tacky...

Most
disturbing "Christmas" image I've seen in recent memory...


Yes, it's the President George W. Bush Christmas Ornament. Clean your screens.


Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Sunday November 28, 2004 at 7:49pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Sunday November 28, 2004 at 3:23pm

Back from Pittsburgh

We spent three days seeing the sights of Pittsburgh with the kids, and although the Science Museum, the Children's Museum, the Incline, the Point, etc., had their charms, my favorite was the
National Aviary. It's not a long visit, an hour and a half, maybe two if you really stretch it, but we found sitting in the rain forest display quite peaceful. And the prices are very reasonable.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Sunday November 28, 2004 at 3:23pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Thursday November 25, 2004 at 6:51am

The Four Day Holiday Weekend

Here we are in America, celebrating a 4 day holiday weekend at the end of November. I'm going to be absent from blogging for most of the weekend, but I thought I'd leave with this thought:

At least every four years, America deserves another work holiday in November. Maybe every two year years. In the beginning of November. And maybe not just one day, but a 4 day work break like much of American has started today.

And I want to jump in and support the candidacy for those running for Congress in 2006 who support such an idea. Here's one:

RICH STEVENSON
CANDIDATE FOR OH 1 US CONGRESS
http://www.geocities.com/dist1oh/rich/index305.html


He even has a writeup on the idea...

National Election Holiday: To promote democracy, our elections must be our most honored national holiday. Our election holiday could last up to four days, with voting Saturday through Monday. The Polls could close at the same time in each time zone throughout the nation, all the way to the most Western time zone, Hawaii. On Tuesday at noon, with all the polls closed, the voting results could be officially released from the "local election commissions." Polling results could not be legally released or broadcast before the official release of "local polling data." This delay would promote political discussion with candidates on the local level during this most revered of our holidays. This would, in fact, teach the civil values we claim with our words on other less meaningful holidays. Nearly all eligible citizens would vote.

I don't agree with everything Mr. Stevenson wrote, but I entirely agree with the sentiment behind it. We need more candidates to make this a priority. I hope they listen to Mr. Stevenson.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Thursday November 25, 2004 at 6:51am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Wednesday November 24, 2004 at 2:31pm

It Has Been A Year



Who thinks he'll be back there tomorrow?

Wednesday November 24, 2004 at 7:12am

When Will Atrios Stop Renting and Buy?

It's not exactly comparable, but I've been wondering why
Atrios hasn't picked up a permanent domain name, rather than holding on to his .blogspot address. He's way too popular to let that continue - if he's going to continue. Having his own domain allows him to have other folks link to him at his own address rather than at blogspot, so if he ever chooses to use another content management system, he would have a lot less work to do on resetting referrals from the old site.

I'm sure he knows this. I just wonder why he hasn't done anything yet. I know that if I had a site as popular as his, and planned to keep it, I'd spend the $15 annually to assign it a unique domain.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday November 24, 2004 at 7:12am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday November 23, 2004 at 3:50pm

Government and Technology - A Roundup

There were quite a few interesting government and technology stories today I thought I'd share:

Technology experts said the latest industry-led initiative to fight spam won't work. Yeah, no kidding. From the
Bradenton Herald:

A tougher anti-spam law, such as a simple ban on all unsolicited e-mail ads, won't get rid of all spam. But it would be a powerful tool for law enforcement to pursue some of the freeloaders and scam artists who make their living off of unwanted, unsavory and often unlawful spam.


That's not going to work either, because it'll take too long for the courts to draw distinct definition to "unsolicited" and "email ads". We're heading for a delivery charge per email, no doubt about it. I'm ready as long as it's reasonable.

Supervisors choose Web over newspapers From the Tahoe Daily Tribune:

From now on, readers wanting to see the reports of a panel that scrutinizes local government will have to look somewhere other than this newspaper.

County officials decided to stop printing reports of the El Dorado County Grand Jury in the newspaper as a way to save money.

For the 2003-04 report, the county published the document over the Internet and ran advertisements in the Tahoe Daily Tribune and the Placerville Mountain Democrat telling interested parties where they could read it.

"There was a sense people who were interested could go online. The printed ones were thrown away," county counsel Lou Green said Monday.

"We figured we save almost $7,000 by doing it this way, " Solaro said, adding the ads cost $400 each in both Sierra-area papers.

About time some of those savings were realized.

Taipei to cloak city in world's largest wi-fi grid
From Stuff.co.nz

Well, we'll believe it when we see it... up and running for several years.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday November 23, 2004 at 3:50pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday November 23, 2004 at 10:45am

The Truth Will Be X-Rays



This may turn out to be a standard for Hollywood...

Dutch actress Georgina Verbaan has vowed to publish x-rays to settle a major controversy - is her ample bosom natural or silicone-based?

A spokesperson for Verbaan, 25, said the x-rays of her breasts would be published on her website (www.georginaverbaan.nl) sometime this week.

Hey, come back! (Dammit, I lose more readers that way...)
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday November 23, 2004 at 10:45am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday November 23, 2004 at 8:02am

Interesting Article About the Death of VHS

Very well worth reading, in
the Guardian. It begins with the news that one of Britain's consumer product chains is no longer going to sell VCRs because demand is gone - DVD is the new king, if only temporarily.

But the article goes into it more, stating that VHS "caused one of the five biggest changes in television history." And it details how it changed television user habits, and by doing so, worked to eliminate a "common culture", the simultaneous viewing of the same program by a large subset of people.

It also revalued the programming that was only available at "difficult" ranges of the day:

The greatest beneficiaries of video recorders, apart from those who loved both television and going out, were programmes relegated to the margins of the schedules.


Worth a read.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday November 23, 2004 at 8:02am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Monday November 22, 2004 at 8:03pm

Transactional Community

There are three requirements to being added to my Transactional Community blogroll:

1. Blog regularly.
2. Blog about politics.
3. Link to this site.

Unfortunately, several members of the Transactional Community have greatly reduced their blogging. I can't say I blame them, the election took the wind out of me as well. But I'm working through it. I hope they do also.

But, if they're still quiet as of December 4th, I'll be editing them out of the blogroll, and looking for new TC friends...

Monday November 22, 2004 at 3:44pm

Political Sites Traffic Goes Down.....

We've seen it three times now with
Political Site of the Day, in '96, '00, and this year: Traffic in a Presidential Election year builds over the course of the year, and is higher than the preceeding three years on annual traffic. After the election, it quickly drops back to the level it will be for the remaining three years, unless there's a monstrous controversy (such as the Ken Starr Report, which causes a short-term spike that was felt for the year).

For reference, see annual traffic reports for DailyKos or Andrew Sullivan's monthly traffic or Wonkette's monthly numbers as well. I wonder if Wonkette appreciates the phallic resemblance of her November traffic numbers...

Kudos for all of them, and many of the other "bigtime" bloggers that leave their Sitemeter traffic information available to the public. It's cool they do that. If I ever get that big, I hope to be that cool.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday November 22, 2004 at 3:44pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Monday November 22, 2004 at 12:14pm

Tourist Destination: Ethiopia

It's a busy work day and I have a neighborhood association meeting tonight, so I don't have a lot of time for the blog today. But I thought this U.N. program idea was interesting, although I don't think that Ethiopians should count on tourism as a long-term mechanism to advance their economy, it might be a step towards doing so.

From BusinessAfrica:

Ethiopia is to become one of the first countries to be targeted under a United Nations scheme harnessing the country's tourism potential in order to tackle entrenched poverty.

Francesco Frangialli, secretary general of the World Tourism Organisation (WTO) announced on Tuesday that Ethiopia would benefit from a WTO-led, development-friendly, tourism scheme. The Sustainable Tourism Eliminating Poverty initiative focuses on encouraging sustainable tourism - social, economic and ecological - to ease poverty.

"It will target the world's poorest countries, particularly in Africa and developing states in general," Frangialli told IRIN at the opening of a three-day tourism conference in Addis Ababa. Ethiopia, with its seven world-heritage sites, is a magnate for tourists, he said.

The WTO, which was accepted as a UN specialised agency late last year, argues that tourism is an effective weapon in helping underdeveloped nations achieve the 2015 anti-poverty Millennium Development Goals. Globally, the tourism industry has created 100,000 new jobs a year, accounting for 11 percent of global employment.

"Tourism is the only service industry where there is a positive balance of trade flowing from first world to third world countries," Frangialli added. Cities like Addis Ababa, he said, where half of young people account for about 50 percent of the population, could reap enormous rewards from growth in the tourist sector. According to the WTO, 50 of the world's poorest nations rank tourism in their top three income sources, attracting vital foreign exchange. "There is growing awareness about the economic importance of the tourism sector," Frangialli said, warning that tourism has negative effects if not properly managed.

The new initiative will offer technical and operational expertise, promote quality ethics and practices, and establish a unit to attract funding for tourism proposals. Tourism features Ethiopia's Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) that aims to combat poverty and encourage development in the Horn-of-Africa nation. The government has revamped its regional airports, is restoring historical sites and offers visas upon entry to the country in a bid to attract more tourists. Last year, according to the tourism commission, some 180,000 people visited the country generating US $80 million.

Ethiopian President Girma Wolde-Girogis said at the conference that tourism promoted greater integration.

"Ethiopia has once again become keenly aware of its immense development potential in tourism and efforts are underway to exploit that potential in the best interests if its people," he noted.


Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday November 22, 2004 at 12:14pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Sunday November 21, 2004 at 6:17pm

Of Menorahs and Christmas Trees...

This kind of story happens every year in different places in the U.S. I wish I knew the solution.

From The Southlake Courier:

Southlake's holiday display will remain completely secular this season, according to community services director Malcolm Jackson.

Jackson, who is charged with the city's Christmas displays, recently received a citizen request to consider placing a menorah among the items displayed.

"We took the request seriously and carefully researched the issues," he said. "We, as a staff, have tried to maintain an absolute secular display in the holiday season." After considering federal and Supreme Court rulings on the subject as reviewed by city attorney Allen Taylor, Jackson determined that it would be inappropriate to place any religious symbols in the city's Christmas season displays. Jackson emphasized that he had made the determination, and the city council had not participated in the decision making.

The city attorney briefed the city council during executive session at the Nov. 16 council meeting on the current state of federal law relating to the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and city Christmas displays. His assessment is that the city's current display complies with federal law. Taylor said that the Supreme Court has said that Santa Claus and Christmas trees are sufficiently secular in origin and nature as to not violate the Establishment Clause. "They merely represent a celebration of the holiday and a close of the year," he added.

I guess I don't understand how items that indicate a celebration of Christmas make those items secular. Christians celebrate Christmas. The holiday, although commercialized, is a religious holiday. It's not a coincidence that the handiwork of Santa Claus is due on December 25th, nor is it coincidence that the handiwork lands under a Christmas tree. They are part and parcel of the Christmas story - a Christian holiday - which makes them nonsecular.

I wonder if Southlake would approve the display of a giant dreidel under their reasoning.

I'm all for promoting Christmas and any other "religious holiday" for the goodwill benefits they generate. Because of that, I think the standards should be based and specified on the attributes a government wishes to promote - such as giving, or self-sacrifice, or whatever, and not the faith that is behind the holiday. Displays should represent those standards.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Sunday November 21, 2004 at 6:17pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Sunday November 21, 2004 at 10:13am

More About Ladybugs...

I think you would be surprised at how many people have written in their blogs about an invasion of ladybugs in their homes...
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Sunday November 21, 2004 at 10:13am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Saturday November 20, 2004 at 8:44pm

Is VeriChip the Mark of the Beast?

Feeling like humanity has a chance?
What if others could monitor you anywhere on Earth?
VeriChip says its microchip implants could save your life if you're kidnapped or rushed to hospital. But would it spell an end to privacy?

'We could monitor you anywhere on Earth,' said VeriChip Corporation president Keith Bolton, if the chip was coupled with a small GPS transmitter hidden in a watch or belt.

'We see a billion dollar market place in Latin American countries.'


Who owns the chips, and the data from the chips? In the USA, where a person can't truly claim to own their phone number, their street address, their email address, their banking information, etc., etc., etc.... why would anyone want to lose control of what may be their most private data? There needs to be a better definition of ownership of information in this society, and the rights that go with that, before we go down this path very far. The company that makes this says as much:
'We're doing it there (Mexico) first because there are no regulations or privacy groups,' admitted Mr Bolton.

Most of the reasons for this technology in the article are, let me say, less than common or less than valuable. GPS for kidnapping victims? Opening doors? As a debit card? Is it really worth the invasion of privacy for this?

Finally, any technology company that uses the line "it's cool to get chipped" and points to teenagers as an example of how "cool" it is might as well just advertise their company as Soulless, because if that's the best you can come up with as a reason for your technology, you're willing to do and say anything to sell it.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Saturday November 20, 2004 at 8:44pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Saturday November 20, 2004 at 6:39am

Saturday Bug Bloggin'


It's the late fall attack of the ladybugs.

Sorry, it's not great of a picture, but that's a lady bug on a toothpaste container in the kids bathroom, taken this week. It's been unseasonably warm this week in Pennsylvania, and the ladybugs made one last-ditch effort to get in the house en masse, and more than a few succeeded upstairs. It's an annual event here, and the kids think it's pretty funny.

Friday November 19, 2004 at 2:58pm

Radio Station Again Taking Issue with Comments by Rocker Ian Anderson

A couple of days ago
I posted from the Asbury Park Press an article about Ian Anderson (of Jethro Tull fame), and his troubles for a year over comments he made about patriotism and nationalism. Apparently the same radio station that was so bothered about his comments last time are looking for more press coverage this time around as well. More, from the Asbury Park Press:
Someone at WCHR-FM is again taking issue with comments by rocker Ian Anderson.

In Tuesday's Press, the Jethro Tull leader reflected on last year's controversy over allegedly anti-American comments he made in an earlier Press article, which led to a boycott of Jethro Tull songs by the Ocean Township-based radio station. WCHR staffers and supporters later protested an Anderson show in Red Bank.

"Mr. Anderson is enjoying some revisionist history," "Dr. Phil" LoCascio wrote the Press via e-mail. LoCascio is an afternoon drive personality at WCHR (which also goes by the name "105.7 The Hawk").

"On the contrary, we were encouraging people to go in and wave the flag. The radio station didn't get our 'knickers in a twist'; it was the listeners of The Hawk who instigated it, many of whom lost loved ones on 9/11. I wonder if those relatives would classify their reaction that way."

He added that most WCHR listeners "could still care less" about Jethro Tull's music, which remains banned from the station's playlist.

And yet, if you look at Amazon Sales Ranks for Jethro Tull music, you find several albums listed in the top 1000 of sales. I guess those folks don't live in the WCHR broadcast area.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Friday November 19, 2004 at 2:58pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Friday November 19, 2004 at 8:32am

Don Imus Is A Dope

Hasn't it been obvious for years? Still, MSNBC won't spend any effort to come up with some sort of quality morning programming. So, they deserve what they get when Imus blunders:

From U.S. NewsWire:

A prominent national Islamic civil rights and advocacy group today called for an apology from the MSNBC cable television network over comments on its "Imus in the Morning" program that referred to Palestinians as "filthy animals" and suggested that they all be killed.

The Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) also urged that the program's host, Don Imus, be reprimanded for failing to challenge his colleagues' inflammatory remarks. CAIR, which says it received numerous complaints about the comments, quoted a transcript of Imus' November 12th program in which he and his on-air colleagues engaged in the following discussion about live coverage of Palestinian President Yasser Arafat's funeral:

DON IMUS: They're (the Palestinians) eating dirt and that fat pig wife of his is living in Paris.

COLLEAGUE: They're all brainwashed, though. That's what it is. And they're stupid, to begin with, but they're brainwashed now. Stinking animals. They ought to drop the bomb right there, kill 'em all right now...

IMUS: Well, the problem is we have (reporter) Andrea (Mitchell) there; we don't want anything to happen to her.

COLLEAGUE: Oh, she's got to get out. Andrea, get out and then drop the bomb and kill everybody...

COLLEAGUE: Look at this. Animals. Animals!

Hey, if you like 60-year-old fratboy consideration of the news, Imus is your man. But the real shame in this story is MSNBC - they have a time period where they could put something useful on television, and they aren't even trying.


Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Friday November 19, 2004 at 8:32am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Friday November 19, 2004 at 7:52am

Constitutional Clause Of The Day

Remember Section 10, Clause 1, as the dollar continues to fall against most major currencies:

Section. 10.

Clause 1: No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.


Thursday November 18, 2004 at 6:46pm

Favorite Cartoon Song?

I don't know about the cartoon, but Teen Titans definitely has one of the catchiest intro songs I've seen on a cartoon in ages (and we have 4 and 8 year olds)...

Since you're here, why not comment on your favorite cartoon theme song?


Thursday November 18, 2004 at 9:18am

A Suggestion for Technorati and Online News Media

Online News Media - newspapers, television, radio, what have you - should provide a link to
Technorati on the page of each news story that references that story. For Example...

This article in The Independent: Junk food ads for children on television to be banned

should have a link to Technorati, at

http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?rank=&url=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.independent.co.uk%2Fuk%2Fpolitics%2Fstory.jsp%3Fstory%3D582751

but, of course, it should say:

What Bloggers Say About This Article

and Technorati ought to create an easy to use applet that will allow it to happen.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Thursday November 18, 2004 at 9:18am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Thursday November 18, 2004 at 7:08am

Big Inequities Persist For Women

From Knight-Ridder

Life has improved for American women over the last 40 years, but big inequities persist and they vary substantially by state, according to an assessment released Tuesday.

Minnesota, Vermont, Connecticut and Washington are the best states for women, concluded the Institute for Women's Policy Research, an arm of George Washington University. That's based on the group's analysis of female political participation, employment and earnings, social and economic autonomy, access to sex education and family planning resources and general health.

Good for those states. Take a look at the states that ranked lowest according to IWPR. All Red States...

By those measures, the toughest states for women are Mississippi, South Carolina, Kentucky, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas. Florida rated a "dishonorable mention," one step above the lowest-ranked group.

Ouch. Interesting how the most inequitable states for women happen to be the same states that are among the most conservative in politics and homogenous in religious denomination in the United States. Sure seems like an opportunity to promote liberal and progressive values in the South.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Thursday November 18, 2004 at 7:08am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Wednesday November 17, 2004 at 8:44pm

How long ago does Halloween seem?



With all the bad national and international news of the past two weeks, seems like it was a couple of years ago.

Wednesday November 17, 2004 at 12:57pm

Could Kinsey's Sex Research Be Done Today?

National Geographic asks this question
in an article under the same name yesterday. Obviously an unknowable question, because society has changed so much since Kinsey's first research was released - in part because of that published research, and the action and reaction and counterreaction that has occurred since.

But, there's a very telling comment in the story:

"All that individual variability that Kinsey discovered is something that we're now trying to make sense of," said Erick Janssen, a research scientist at the Kinsey Institute.

...

Controversy hounded Kinsey and his work from the start. Cultural conservatives deplored him for his homosexual experimentation and for encouraging his research colleagues to swap wives in the name of science.

Critics later charged that Kinsey had conducted sexual experimentation on children, an allegation that his defenders describe as part of a political witch-hunt.

Today sex researchers say they are again feeling the heat of a politically conservative crusade mounting against them. Last year the U.S. Congress threatened to withdraw government funding of several sex studies, including Janssen's.

Where would Kinsey have gotten funding for his research under the Bush Administration?



Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday November 17, 2004 at 12:57pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Wednesday November 17, 2004 at 9:12am

What Would Happen if the Democratic Party Split?

This is more of an exercise in ideas rather than something proposed to be done. But I've been wondering if we're missing the point - the point being not that Democratic Party candidates be elected, but that the ideas that we want the Party to carry be absorbed and accepted into governing.

Perhaps that isn't best done by picking one person representative of one monster party to go against another person representative of the other monster party, winner take all. Perhaps the best way to do this is to flood the market with ideas from smaller parties. Not small parties, but perhaps 1/3 to 1/2 the resources of the current Democratic Party. Not regional parties, just smaller national parties.

I don't know how such a cleavage of the Party might be done, philosophically. And for the point of this discussion, it isn't really important. The bigger question is how it may benefit the promotion of ideas, structurally. Adding a couple more substantive parties to the national discussion could really shake up the positioning of ideas from the polarization we see quite often today to an accepted realization of the gray areas in debate.

The short-term could be pretty painful, the long-term could be much better, for progressives and liberals. Or not. It would be worth reading opinions about any possible benefits of a splitting of the Party.
I posted at DailyKos yesterday and there were some interesting points made.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday November 17, 2004 at 9:12am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday November 16, 2004 at 6:39pm

Pat Toomey, OMB?

And no, that's not Orchestral Manoeuvres In The Barf...

From
ToomeyBlog:

Taxes & Spending
Santorum Backs Toomey for OMB Director
by John Gizzi
Posted Nov 15, 2004

Apparently hoping to heal some wounds, Republican Sen. Rick Santorum (R.-Pa.), who angered many conservatives when he supported liberal Sen. Arlen Specter against Rep. Pat Toomey (R.-Pa.) in this year's Pennsylvania Senate primary, now says Toomey would be a good choice to head the Office of Management and Budget in the Bush White House. "Yes, Pat would be outstanding in that position if it should become vacant," Santorum told me after a luncheon of conservatives held before the election. "He understands the issue of cutting spending about as well as anyone in Congress and he would also have an excellent relationship with his former colleagues." There are rumors that present OMB chief Josh Bolten may move to another position in the administration.


Wonder if Santorum really is concerned that Toomey could make a run at his seat in 2006? Or, just more Keystone GOP backscratching...
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday November 16, 2004 at 6:39pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday November 16, 2004 at 1:47pm

Ian Anderson's Thoughts On Bruce Springsteen

The reason I've been writing about Ian Anderson is due to an interesting article in the
Asbury Park Press. Anderson spent part of the interview talking about the costs of supporting a candidate or a position, particularly in today's emotional political climate. This comment really struck me:

"I'm sure Bruce Springsteen gets a hundred death threats every week for his participation in the Kerry campaign," Anderson says. "But if you want to be John Kerry's running mate and be 'Born in the U.S.A.' at the same time, that's the way it goes."

If true, that's a terrible statement about America today. Sadly, it seems pretty likely to me.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday November 16, 2004 at 1:47pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday November 16, 2004 at 9:10am

Ian Anderson and Patriotism

About a year ago, Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull fame ran into trouble with a segment of America when he said this:

"I hate to see the American flag hanging out of every bloody station wagon, out of every SUV, every little Midwestern house in some residential area. It's easy to confuse patriotism with nationalism."

There were boycotts of Anderson and Jethro Tull called for. There were efforts to cause trouble at his concerts. Anderson basically apologized for the first sentence, which I appreciate since the word "hate" bothers me as well. But I think there are problems with his second sentence as well.

Take a look in the dictionary. Webster calls patriotism "Love of country". WordNet definites it as "n : love of country and willingness to sacrifice for it [syn: nationalism]". Nationalism is a synonym of Patriotism.

There appears to be a change in the definition of Patriot and Patriotism. Those words existed before there was a United States, about people who lived in the territory that would become the United States. There was no nation of the U.S. At that time, their country was England, and yet these people in America fought the British, and called themselves Patriots.

To me, that means they were fighting for the ideal of a country. That's quite different than fighting for the country - as the example of 1776 shows. We need to get back to that definition as part of popular culture and conventional wisdom. It is neither at this point. And although Ian Anderson may see it the same way I do, most of America doesn't seem to.

If we're going to revere Patriotism, we need to better define it. And if Patriotism is going to be a euphamism for Nationalism, then we need a word for those who fight for the ideals of this country.

Monday November 15, 2004 at 6:10pm

Ohio: Official Recount Now Expected

From the Institute for Public Accuracy:

DAVID COBB, [via Blair Bobier, b2@bobierlaw.com], www.votecobb.com
Cobb was the 2004 presidential candidate for the Green Party. He said today: "We announced our intention to seek a recount of the vote in Ohio. Since the required fee for a statewide recount is $113,600, the only question was whether that money could be raised in time to meet the filing deadline. That question has been answered. Thanks to the thousands of people who have contributed to this effort, we can say with certainty that there will be a recount in Ohio." The Green Party is working with the Libertarian Party in securing a recount. The presidential candidates for the two parties have demanded that Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, a Republican who co-chaired this year's Bush campaign in Ohio, recuse himself from the recount process.

There's another part of the story to this, beyond the reported recount. And that is, both the Green Party and the Libertarian Party may have found there are other ways to give themselves a better power position at the table of governing than their vote totals were going to provide. Good for them.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday November 15, 2004 at 6:10pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Monday November 15, 2004 at 8:17am

Junk food ads for children on television to be banned

In the UK.
From the Independent:

Ministers will order television companies this week to come up with a new set of rules to stop children being exposed to advertisements encouraging them to fill their stomachs with unhealthy food or drink, or face an outright ban.

Ofcom, the broadcasting regulator, will be given the task of negotiating a new agreement that will affect all television advertising shown outside school hours and before 9pm.

John Reid, the Secretary of State for Health, believes that he has public opinion behind him for a campaign that could hit powerful commercial interests, but will ease worries about the number of overweight children.

His public health White Paper, expected this week, will warn that if the industry does not police itself, the Government will legislate to make it illegal to advertise junk food when children are watching.


This probably will never fly in the U.S., despite the public health value. Will be interesting to watch the fight in the U.K.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday November 15, 2004 at 8:17am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Sunday November 14, 2004 at 9:16am

Is There Such A Thing As A Nonlethal Gun?

There was the problem in the Boston accident a few weeks ago where a student was killed by a pepper spray pellet. Different technology, same result - a couple of stories about how folks are being
killed by stun guns:

Two Sacramento County men who recently died when they were shot with stun guns both were taking medication for mental illness, renewing concerns about the supposedly non-lethal weapons.

Ricardo Zaragoza and Gordon Rauch each were shot at least twice with 50,000 volt Tasers after they fought with Sacramento County sheriff's deputies. Zaragoza died Monday and Rauch last year, but they are among a growing list of suspects taking medication or other drugs whose encounters with the weapons proved fatal.

Experts say the incidents prove the need for studying the effect of Tasers on sensitive individuals, including those taking prescription or illegal drugs.

"There's really almost no medical research examining this issue," Dr. Kathy Glatter told The Sacramento Bee. She is a University of California, Davis Medical Center electrophysiologist, a cardiologist who specializes in heart rhythm disorders and sudden death.

"Many of those medicines can cause life-threatening heart rhythms, although it's rare, and they are generally considered safe," Glatter said. "But the combination perhaps in the wrong person could be lethal."

At least 76 people have died in the United States and Canada since 2001 after they were shot with Tasers, according to Mark Silverstein, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union chapter in Colorado. A high percentage were using stimulants, and at least six coroner's reports found Tasers were a contributing factor.

76 people? I would think that's enough to warrant considerable research. And Taser International ought to embrace the idea. But they don't sound like they are...

Officials at Arizona-based Taser International said the weapon has been vindicated.

"Several studies have stated the Taser is most likely not a contributing factor during the custody deaths," said spokesman Steve Tuttle.

Most likely not doesn't cut it. Get the facts.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Sunday November 14, 2004 at 9:16am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Saturday November 13, 2004 at 8:14pm

Building A New Appreciation for Inmates

I suspect that most folks drive as quickly away as safely possible when they're confronted with jail work crews on public roads. Their "free" labor is not appreciated as much as the concern about the risk. I suspect that bus drivers and riders in Rochester, New York, might have a greater appreciation after this winter.

From Rochester Democrat and Chronicle:

Monroe County Jail inmates will be put to work this winter clearing snow from bus stops to ease passage for riders, especially those with disabilities.

The Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority announced a partnership Tuesday with the Sheriff's Office to have inmates clear its busiest stops.

"Obviously it is difficult to get 300 bus drivers to go out and shovel out 4,500 bus stops if they are trying to stay on schedule and get people to work," said Mark Aesch, chief executive officer of the RGRTA. "We have selected the 250 most active bus stops in the RTS system for the inmates in the outdoor work program, to shovel away snow from those spots so folks can access those stops."

Inmates in the county's Outside Work Program will take on the task of snow removal. The program allows inmates who have earned the trust of jail officials to participate in outside chores such as road and park cleanup in the summer and installation of snow fences in the winter.

I hope the inmates feel good about this, because it's a good thing they'll be doing.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Saturday November 13, 2004 at 8:14pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Saturday November 13, 2004 at 12:45pm

There's Free Porn On The Highways

That is, if you find the right person to drive next to...

Video viewing in moving vehicles is another example of how quickly sex entrepreneurs convert new communications technology to their own use. Each year, hundreds of thousands of vehicles arrive in the dealer showrooms equipped with video systems. The original idea was to provide entertainment for passengers, particularly children, in the back seats.

But some drivers occasionally pop in adult videos for themselves or their passengers. Public officials and ordinary citizens who have glimpsed such naughty bits or heard about them are outraged. Already the trend is generating scornful labels, including "drive-by porn," "dirty driving" and "vehicular obscenity."

It's mostly an outrage because it's so obviously a distraction from driving. If they were parked, I'm not sure I'd care, but driving? Watch the headlights on the road, guys.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Saturday November 13, 2004 at 12:45pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Saturday November 13, 2004 at 7:57am

Saturday Bug Bloggin'



Mmmm, 17-Year Cicada in Black Bean Paste... courtesy of the
2004 Great Insect Fair, at Penn State.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Saturday November 13, 2004 at 7:57am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Friday November 12, 2004 at 8:25pm

Conservative Groups May Go After Santorum Next

It's enough to make you laugh. Looks like political cannibalism is the rage in the Republican Party. And in the kitchen are the religious conservative chefs of the Party.

From the News Observer:

Conservative groups are urging Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum to help lead the fight to deny the Senate Judiciary Committee chairmanship to his colleague, Sen. Arlen Specter.

The groups noted that they already were upset with Santorum, the No. 3 Republican in the Senate, for supporting Specter earlier this year in his GOP primary contest against Rep. Patrick Toomey, a conservative and strong opponent of abortion.

If Santorum hopes to avoid his own Senate primary battle in two years -and perhaps make a run for president in 2008 - he needs to heed conservative concerns about whether Specter, a moderate, can be trusted to shepherd President Bush's judicial nominees through the Senate, the groups said.

"When I was out on the road in Pennsylvania, people were so angry with Sen. Santorum for backing Sen. Specter" in the primary, said the Rev. Patrick Mahoney, head of the Christian Defense Coalition. "Wouldn't it be fascinating if Congressman Toomey ran a primary against Santorum?"


Fascinating ain't the word I was thinking of... maybe surreal? After all the support and political promotion Rick Santorum has given Christian groups in the past, he ought to be pissed off about such threats made to him. That is, if he didn't know the nature of the folks he was dealing with already...
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Friday November 12, 2004 at 8:25pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Friday November 12, 2004 at 4:01pm

Bug Bloggin'

I like
Pam in MA's blog idea at DailyKos today - Bug Blogging.

I'm going to try to do this as a regular feature on the weekend, at least as long as we have bugs for photos...
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Friday November 12, 2004 at 4:01pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Friday November 12, 2004 at 1:43pm

BlogExplosion Context

I dunno. I signed up for
BlogExplosion like everyone else, and have perused the Surf Blogs for traffic, but where's the context? Why am I going to where I'm going when I do the Surf Blogs? Is this just a blogger party line?

Anyways, I thought I'd add a little context of what I found today in my visit, at least what I found of interest...

Notes from an Exile asks the obvious question after the election: Is the internet, people are beginning to ask, merely an enormous, resounding echo chamber?

My answer: no, still more like shortwave radio. But the spectrum is getting VERY crowded...

Alternative Energy Blog was a good find, I think I'll stash it for a Political Site of the Day selection some time.

Seems like everyone browseable ON BlogExplosion has an entry talking ABOUT BlogExplosion.

One last item - Cub fans ought to appreciate this, there was another dud left at Wrigley Field recently. Only this time, it was a hand grenade...
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Friday November 12, 2004 at 1:43pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Friday November 12, 2004 at 9:03am

Just How Can I Crank Up My Career Again?

From Top 40 Charts

Twisted Sister's Dee Snider drops in on The USS Nimitz to host The VH1 Classic Thanksgiving Special

Twisted Sister frontman and radio personality Dee Snider recently visited the world's largest aircraft carrier, the USS Nimitz, to tape a VH 1 Classic Thanksgiving special that features video requests and dedications from crew members serving on the aircraft carrier.

While aboard the Nimitz, Snider also hosted a live broadcast of his radio show on Philadelphia's WMMR and performed such infamous Twisted Sister hits as "We're Not Gonna Take It" and "I Wanna Rock" with a band drawn from the crew of Nimitz.

Nothing says Thanksgiving like Dee Snider on an aircraft Carrier. How did Hallmark miss this?
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Friday November 12, 2004 at 9:03am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Thursday November 11, 2004 at 4:16pm

Mort Kondracke Plays In The Shallow End

Anybody else sick of secularism being blamed for society's ills? Check out Kondracke...

From the
Grand Forks Herald:

If fair-minded secular Democrats went to church - they are open to the public, by the way - here's some of what they'd learn: Lesson No. 1: Far more than abortion, evolution or homosexuality, Evangelical Christianity is about love, redemption, forgiveness, charity, humility, hope and self-sacrifice ....

Lesson No. 2: Evangelicals are scared, too. They are scared of the fruits of secularism and the deterioration of the culture in which they're trying to raise their children. Of hip-hop lyrics that encourage rape and murder. Of PG-13 movies and "family hour" sitcoms that tell children that if they're not having sex at 16, they're out of it. Of the scuzzy showbiz people who often surround Democrats ....

Lesson No. 3 for Democrats: Respect religion by nominating a presidential candidate who "gets it." Kerry gave the impression of faking it, visiting African-American churches only late in the campaign and, seemingly, for political purposes. Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.), an Orthodox Jew, clearly did "get" it.


Talk about hanging around scuzzy showbiz people - Mort, aren't you guilty of the same? Don't want to be? Get off of Fox, playground of famous scuzball Bill O'Reilly. Here you go, claiming that Democrats don't go to church. Here you go, claiming that the fruits of secularism are rape and adolescent sex. Here you are, claiming that the only way to respect religion is to attend church.

Where's your humility - how could you possibly know these things? Where's your self-sacrifice - why not work towards helping Democrats achieve these things you claim they should do, rather than deride them for not? Where's your charity - accepting that the side of the coin that Kerry saw still respected religion?

Like the Bible teaches, I try to be a forgiving person. But Mort, you've been a hypocrit for way too long.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Thursday November 11, 2004 at 4:16pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Thursday November 11, 2004 at 9:30am

Nuclear Weapons Testing in 2007?

There's a rather disturbing piece at
Nuclear Watch of New Mexico this week...

Nuclear Weapons Testing in 2007?

What can we expect in future nuclear weapons issues now that Bush has been reelected? One possibility is a return to full-scale testing by the U.S.

The Bush Administration has been openly hostile to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (first sought by President Eisenhower). In November 2002 the U.S. was the only country to vote against keeping the CTBT on the United Nation's agenda.

The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is the semi-autonomous nuclear weapons agency within the Department of Energy. Its FY 2005 budget now declares as "Performance Indicators" for its testing program:

...Readiness to conduct underground testing as established by National Security policy and documented in the Program Plan for Test Readiness... FY2005 - Produce list of possible test scenarios and confirm that plans will enable these tests [repeated for each year through 2009]. FY 2006... - Prepare plan for device-specific NESS.

NNSA FY05 Congressional Budget Request, page 84

A NESS is a Nuclear Explosives Safety Study, required before an actual test. "Device-specific" indicates that a particular nuclear weapons type is being prepared for testing. Therefore we can expect the possible resumption of full-scale testing in 2007.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Thursday November 11, 2004 at 9:30am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Thursday November 11, 2004 at 8:24am

Google News Search Fun

Just a little bit of fun using Google News Search:

Number of Results for various searches:

Liberal + Controversy = 1,670 results
Conservative + Controversy = 2,890 results
Liberal + Conservative + Controversy = 930 results

Conservatives win!

Liberal + Scandal = 1,420 results
Conservative + Scandal = 1,490 results
Conservative + Liberal + Scandal = 583 results

Conservatives again, by a nose.

Of course, Liberal searches excluding the Conservative term tend to be dominated by stories outside the United States, and Conservative searches excluding the Liberal term are dominated by stories within the United States.

Wednesday November 10, 2004 at 3:47pm

Email

From Federal Computer Week:

Solving the nation's spam problem will require a balancing act, legal and privacy experts said today in Washington, D.C., at a meeting sponsored by the Federal Trade Commission.

Dubbed the E-mail Authentication Summit, the meeting drew several hundred software industry officials, users and others to discuss the policy and technical implications of adopting industrywide standards for dealing with unwanted commercial e-mail by accurately identifying — or authenticating — who is sending it.

Once identified, spammers can be prosecuted under antifraud laws.

If industry adopts such standards, care must be taken to balance people's right to be rid of unwanted commercial e-mail and users' right to use e-mail for anonymous political speech, said Duane Berlin, general counsel at the Council of American Survey Research Organizations. "Both sides of the equation are important, both rights exist," he said.

I don't understand what right people have to use email for anonymous political speech. This sounds like a very bad prospect for abuse.

"The e-mail world is very big and surprisingly fragile," Levine said, adding that making it secure poses challenges similar to making the U.S. Postal Service's system anthrax-resistant.

No kidding. Between spam and overwhelmed mailservers, I'm finding it harder and harder to retrieve my own email. I'm ready to consider a sender-based cost model to try to work some of these things out.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday November 10, 2004 at 3:47pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Wednesday November 10, 2004 at 1:37pm

Have You Been Unemployed For More than 39 Weeks?

If so, you're not alone. 14.5% of those unemployed have been unemployed that long. There's a graph as well, all courtesy of the
Economic Policy Institute. The U.S. hasn't seen that kind of number since 92-93.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday November 10, 2004 at 1:37pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Wednesday November 10, 2004 at 7:11am

Republicans for Choice

Is there any doubt that
these folks are going to be seriously rolled over for the next four years? Arlen Specter is going to be a reality check for them.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday November 10, 2004 at 7:11am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday November 9, 2004 at 7:41pm

From Technorati Customer Support

After seeing very little in the way of recent currency of the data in Technorati's blog database, I emailed them. To my surprise and appreciation, I received a pretty quick response. The core of it:

Me:
I have a dumb question. Until you made your changes to your site, my site, http://aboutpolitics.blogspot.com, was regularly updated in your database. Now, I can't seem to get an update. Is there something I should do on my blog to facilitate spidering?

Technorati:
Our spiders are currently a bit backlogged and should be up to speed in a few days. We apologize for the delay and appreciate your patience.


Thanks Technorati. Will stay tuned.

Tuesday November 9, 2004 at 12:48pm

The Blogger Gospel, from Keith Olbermann

If bloggers are serious about pushing stories to the traditional news media, Keith Olbermann has some wise
words of advice:

...one way bloggers can help guide the mainstream at times like this: source your stuff like crazy, and the stuffier the source the better.


You know what they say about opinions, and the blogosphere's denizens can be freaks of anatomy in that regard. So if you want to get (and more importantly, keep) the attention of those in the news media, load up with source material.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday November 9, 2004 at 12:48pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday November 9, 2004 at 7:06am

Contributing for Ideas

I find myself looking at the Contribute Box at
DailyKos, and the dollar amounts:

The Kos Dozen: $546,392
Dem Party: $105,179
DSCC: $8,052
John Kerry: $83,760

Almost $740K in one year. Damn impressive.

This money was used during a seller's market (higher demand for everything a campaign might purchase), and it was used to promote candidates.

I hope, but suspect I won't, see this again in 2005, but if I did, I'd like to see a different tact - the promotion of ideas and beliefs, not candidates. Instead of the Kos Dozen candidates, make it the Kos Dozen Persuasions, or something like that.

Kossacks could define these persuasions there, refine these persuasions there, with the goal to make the substance of ideas and beliefs absorbant - and absorbed by many of those who currently oppose them.

That would mean taking these "persuasions" to the red states. Advertising these persuasions in ways that are received with less defense by others. Again, this is about the power to share beliefs and ideas with those who seem like they should agree with them, but do not.

Obviously, in order to do this, Kossacks would have to determine a list of priority issues/ideas. We'd have to figure out how to offer in a non-threatening way our beliefs, yet make those beliefs attractive to drawing new support. It means listening to others in order to figure out how to share, rather than preach, all-the-while not losing focus of the goals of the issue/idea.

In short, I'm arguing that we use the next year to promote ideas rather than candidates - through advertising campaigns.

Liberal ideas as a marketed product? Yes.

Will it happen? I'm sorry to say, unlikely.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday November 9, 2004 at 7:06am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday November 9, 2004 at 6:54am

Update on Mark Belling

His radio talk show was pulled for his use of a racial slur. That appears to be Clear Channel talk for "temporarily suspended". With or without pay is unknown, but most likely with...

If that's the case, it's more like a paid vacation.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday November 9, 2004 at 6:54am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Monday November 8, 2004 at 2:56pm

Another Rumsfeld Fairy Tale?

Like he has any credibility over what will happen in Iraq...

From Yahoo!

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said Monday that large numbers of Iraqi civilians would not be killed, "certainly not by U.S. forces," during the siege to retake Fallujah, even as the top U.S. commander there predicted a "major confrontation" between insurgents and up to 15,000 troops in the Sunni Muslim city.


Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday November 8, 2004 at 2:56pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Monday November 8, 2004 at 6:44am

Hell Yes There Are Critics For E-Voting

FCW.com has an article today entitled "
E-voting goes (mostly) smoothly, but suspicions, critics remain". Well, no kidding. Maybe they ought to read the guts of their own article before determining the headline:

Some potentially serious problems were reported late last week, as election officials continued counting and checking votes. One Ohio precinct, where only 638 ballots were cast, reported 4,258 votes for President Bush, according to an Associated Press report. Officials who found the error said Bush actually got 365 votes to John Kerry's 260.

Equally troubling, voters in some precincts claimed that the machines showed them summary screens reflecting different votes than the ones they had cast, but they were able to change to their preferred candidates.

"The thing that is worrisome about these [complaints] is that we've seen it across all systems," Cohn said. "It doesn't seem to be limited to one [brand] of machine." She said many voters may not have noticed that their confirmation screens listed incorrect choices.

Many of those who believe the e-voting systems are still too prone to errors and vulnerable to tampering said the technology did not prove itself Nov. 2.

"A lot of people are missing the big picture," said Aviel Rubin, a critic of e-voting and a computer science professor at Johns Hopkins University. "They're focused on whether the machines worked" from the voter's point of view.

But if something affected the final vote tallies, whether it was deliberate or accidental, voters would almost certainly never notice, he said.

"A smart person who wanted to rig the election would do it for a close race," he said. "This was the perfect opportunity. We don't have any evidence that it happened, but we don't know."

Rubin co-authored a 2003 report detailing security vulnerabilities in one version of Diebold Inc.'s Diebold Election Systems' voting machine software. Diebold is one of several firms that develops software for touch-screen voting machines and the back-end tabulation systems. Rubin has been a proponent of enabling the machines to create paper records that voters would verify before leaving. Polling places could use the records if a manual recount is needed.


Of course, the folks at Diebold claim that the election proved acceptance to e-voting - as is.

David Bear, a spokesman for Diebold, argued that the Nov. 2 election experience validates electronic voting.

"This election did a lot," he said. "You see overwhelming acceptance, even preference, from voters. I think the national dialogue is good. Where the problem comes up — and, unfortunately, I think this happened some before this election — is when the dialogue serves only to confuse and frighten voters."


E-voting - and a requirement for paper trails - has to be one of the top 3 or 4 issues that the Democrats work on in the next two years. In a perfect world, it should be the most important issue, but we're apparently stuck with Bush's course away from striving for perfection. This unaccountability and nonverifiability isn't acceptable.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday November 8, 2004 at 6:44am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Sunday November 7, 2004 at 6:29pm

Is Mark Belling A Racist?

Hey, I don't know this dude, don't listen to Milwaukee AM radio, but I can tell you this: AM conservative talk radio people are ALL about labeling. That's what they do. Label the opposition. Label the things they don't like. Label, label, label... That is what they do.

So, it's not so surprising to me that Mark Belling, conservative talk-radio host, said a slur against a group of people...

From the SunHerald:

Mark Belling used the word "wetback," a derogatory term to describe illegal Mexican immigrants, in a discussion on his Oct. 27 show about potential voter fraud in Wisconsin.

"You watch the voter turnout on the near south side (of Milwaukee), heavily Hispanic, and compare it to the voter turnout in any other election, and you're going to see every wetback and every other non-citizen out there voting," he said.

He sarcastically apologized on the air last Monday, then joked about the situation for days and polled listeners about whether he should have apologized.


And that is what passes for political discussion and thoughtful debate on conservative talk radio.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Sunday November 7, 2004 at 6:29pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Sunday November 7, 2004 at 7:20am

The Bumps of Technorati's Ride

From The Seattle Times:

On Tuesday, the volume of conversations on the Web reached a crescendo. The number of postings to blogs rose to nearly 800,000, double the daily average, said David Sifry, founder and chief executive of Technorati, which monitors Web logs. David and Micah Sifry are brothers.


I use Technorati to try to research blog entries, find points of view that would be useful to reference in this blog. They seem to be in the process of making technical changes, as output appearance has changed recently.

I wonder, though, if the volume of postings has really crunched their ability to update quickly. Just as Blogger has been hard to access this past week, Technorati's output has been... very dated, at least for the blog world, the past week.

A dated search engine of blogs isn't going to cut it. Hopefully, this is a temporary delay in Technorati's status.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Sunday November 7, 2004 at 7:20am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Saturday November 6, 2004 at 4:33pm

Hillary Now...

I have to say,
sites like these aren't very encouraging for liberal values...

The party is split between the Kerry/Edwards gang, vs the Deaniacs, or those who see Hillary as the potentially strongest Democrat, able to raise the monies, and make the most impact in bringing people out to vote, and especially those who could have, but didn't show yesterday.

Hillarynow.com is leading this effort.


Democrats should start out by looking at what their platforms should really say, and why, and how to explain that to America. We can get to candidates later. The Cult of Personality approach isn't good for America.


Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Saturday November 6, 2004 at 4:33pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Saturday November 6, 2004 at 9:04am

Go Read Soj

She writes
Flogging the Simian from Romania, and she covers a ton of international stories of interest that you'll rarely see much about here in the States. She gets more traffic than my blog (who doesn't) but not nearly as much as she deserves. Lots of common sense. For example:

Having traveled and lived in many other countries, the American system of just two parties seems hopelessly outdated. If a relatively small country like Romania has no less than 12 people running for president, representing at least 15 separate political parties, how can just two political parties adequately serve an American population more than ten times larger? That's like saying your local ice cream store can please all of its customers by only serving chocolate and vanilla. Are there no "strawberry" lovers in the United States?


I'm going to try to write about this sometime soon in my blog. I'm tending to think that the Democratic Party might be better off to split into factions based on philosophy and issue. Remember, it's the philosophy and the ideas that are important to get to the forefront of national governing, not necessarily the Democratic Party. Swamping the intellectual marketplace in the election for President might be how that is best done.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Saturday November 6, 2004 at 9:04am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Friday November 5, 2004 at 12:44pm

Exporting Liberal Values, Take II

How do we break down preconceptions and prejudice?

Expose those who have those preconcepts and prejudices to the humanity of those they label.

Is it any accident that Florida is a swing state, but Alabama is not? That Nevada might be turning, but Idaho is so conservative?

Floridians see liberals every day. They live there. They visit there. They find out they're not so bad.

Nevadans see the same thing also.

But how often do you hear someone from a blue state talking about vacationing in Alabama? Idaho? Kansas?

Sure it happens, but not enough. The pot is not stirred. The beliefs are not mixed.

Yesterday I wrote about how there are 9 states where a slight movement in population from blue states to red states could considerably change the electoral map. But that's very drastic, and not a likelihood.

But what if the Democratic Party started getting into the "vacation" business? Offering vacations to red states - the heart of red states - and mixing the pot?

If we're serious about expanding the dialogue between conservatives and liberals, rather than just continuing the labeling, then there are going to need to be liberals in the heart of red states, there to talk and listen to conservatives.

If to only break down the preconcepts and prejudices.

Friday November 5, 2004 at 12:37pm

This Ain't Even Close to Reality Television

and in this case, it's not a good thing. From
Duluth News Tribune:

NBC's "The West Wing," assuming it lasts past the end of this season, will continue to twist itself into a pretzel in an attempt to attract people who were never likely to watch a show about policy and politics in the first place.


No kidding. The West Wing has to be on its last legs. Is there a more dated show premise on network television at this time? Can the show.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Friday November 5, 2004 at 12:37pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Thursday November 4, 2004 at 2:35pm

If This Isn't Resolved Properly, Sue

And take it as high up as it can go if need be, to the Supreme Court. Without court intervention, we're never going to see a standard established for computerized voting that is worth anything.

From Yahoo!

More than 4,500 votes may be lost in one North Carolina county because officials believed a computer that stored ballots electronically could hold more data than it did. Scattered other problems may change results in local races around the state.

Officials are investigating whether the lost votes in coastal Carteret County can be retrieved somehow, said state Board of Elections Executive Director Gary Bartlett.

Local officials said UniLect Corp., the maker of the county's electronic voting system, told them that each storage unit could handle 10,500 votes, but the limit was actually 3,005 votes.


Is it just irony, or is the name of the voting system maker actually truth in advertising?
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Thursday November 4, 2004 at 2:35pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Thursday November 4, 2004 at 8:18am

What Will The Godless Americans PAC Be Doing?

I think
GAMPAC realizes they have a tough four years ahead. I found a few comments in this statement on the election
from Ellen Johnson, Executive Director of GAMPac, to be interesting:

Even with a lagging economy, an unjustified war on Iraq, fifty million Americans without health insurance and more, the religious right has successfully made "traditional moral values" a pressing political issue. But when they talk about "moral values" they are not talking about "morals" per se. When we think about morals, we think about character. We think about things like not stealing and not killing; we think about helping others and being good people. That is not what they mean. When religious conservatives refer to "morality" they are talking about sociopolitical issues like abortion, gay marriage, euthanasia, stem-cell research and of course state-church separation issues and all that encompasses like organized prayers in the public schools, the Ten Commandments on public property, the teaching of evolution and creationism in the public schools, the removal of the words "under God" in the pledge of allegiance, etc.

...

Unfortunately, the leaders of the abortion, gay, feminist, scientific and other progressive movements have failed to address the root problem, which hinders their causes and that is religion. They will not challenge religion or the religious for fear of alienating their religious supporters. Eleven states in this election passed referendums outlawing gay marriage. How did the gays allow that to happen? It happened because the gays want to befriend the religious and work with the religious in the hope of being accepted and ultimately change minds that way. It is a good idea in theory but we have just seen how successful it is in reality.

We Atheists have always been there to support their causes when it is they who should have been supporting ours, for that support would redound to their benefit. All too often liberal cause groups are reluctant to accept our support for fear of appearing anti-religious. One lesson from the November election, however, may be that until these groups more openly embrace the support of millions of Atheists and other "seculars" throughout the nation, they will be forever spinning their political wheels. Religion is the problem and not the solution. Religion has been the driving force behind the anti-choice laws, the opposition to stem-cell research, the opposition to gay rights and state-church separation. As long as scientific, feminist, gay and other such organizations fail to address the root causes of their issues then they will not make much progress. Gays, women, and scientists want it both ways. They want to advance their progressive issues and not challenge the threat to them, which is religion. We Atheists need to tell these leaders that religion is the problem and it must be addressed. We need to step off the defense bus and get on the offensive.


She may very well be right, that the issue of religion in America and its role in politics needs to be tackled head on. There are three general kinds of people in the world: those who use only reason to guide their decisions, those who try to balance reason and faith to guide, and those who rely primarily on faith to guide. There will be no way of avoiding a challenge to those who rely primarily on faith, because many see any question of faith as a challenge. But the discussion needs to be had with those who balance reason and faith because they are the majority in this equation, and it has to be done in a way that does not threaten their values, but simply asks them to consider the issues. And that discussion needs to be dealt with in a historic viewpoint, for example, for scientists (how religion has constantly tried to delay the pursuit and dissemination of science - from Galileo to the Scopes Monkey Trial to stem cell research). In many ways, history is not the friend of organized religion, and paints a picture of misuse of power by organized religion that continues to this day.

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Thursday November 4, 2004 at 8:18am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Wednesday November 3, 2004 at 5:46pm

Invading the Red States

What do the following states have in common?

Alaska
Montana
North Dakota
Nevada
South Dakota
Iowa
New Mexico
West Virginia
Wyoming

They all apparently went to Bush. Combined, they are enough electoral votes to change the result of the election - 34 EVs. They were all decided by less than 100,000 votes.

What do these three states have in common?

California
Massachusetts
New York

They all went to Kerry. Kerry won the three states by 2.9 million voters, give or take a few.

How is it that these three states are hogging the good voters? Okay, that's simplistic, but there's a concentration of values in these three states that really doesn't benefit the nation at large.

It seems to me that Democrats, if they really believe that changing the government is so important, shouldn't be talking about moving out of country. They should be talking about moving to Montana, or Nevada, or Wyoming, where they can really change the dynamic - and distribute the priority and voting values from these liberal-heavy states to a place where their vote can have more value on the national level.

This diary is a musing, really, I'm just thinking out loud. I'm not sure there are even 100,000 Democrats in those three states that would commit to the period of time to build residency in just one coordinated state to even try to force such a change, let alone enough for 9 states. It would take a pioneering spirit of the political kind to volunteer to do this.

Wednesday November 3, 2004 at 6:30am

What Does It Mean?

This morning we appear to be on the verge of an official 4 more years of George W. Bush. To say I understand how 3.5 million more people in this nation voted differently than how I voted isn't really possible. Should I want to understand it? I know I should. But I thought the choice was clearly stated in a way that would preclude this result, that Americans couldn't really choose Bush over Kerry by a majority, with everything we've learned about both men.

I was wrong. It is a realization that my version of reality was based too much on my expectation of how things should be and not enough on how things actually are. It's not a good realization, and it makes you wonder if you're this far off on everything else in life. Husbands and wives that find out that their spouse is having an affair go through this at a much greater level - this gnawing doubt that nothing is how they thought it was. But I feel that way today - thinking that Americans were committed to an ideal of America that George Bush doesn't represent, but finding out that they're more committed to a different set of values that frankly disturb me.

How long will this sense of jarred reality last? How damaged is my sense of confidence in when and where to invest in hope? I don't know.

Updated: Some similar thoughts elsewhere:

From The Talent Show: It's funny how sometimes you can be so certain about things that you just end up fooling yourself.

From Outlandish Josh: The question is whether or not I'll be happy living in a country like this. It's an open question.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Wednesday November 3, 2004 at 6:30am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Tuesday November 2, 2004 at 8:31am

Well, I've Voted

Went down at 9 AM and stood in line for 20 minutes to vote. By far, the biggest line I've seen on election day at this precinct in 9 years, and I've gone at all sorts of times and vote every election.

Our precinct is in a church, which is nice - plenty of cover from the rain if it happens here later today (which I would expect). Folks from the church are selling baked goods, so when the line gets longer at noon and after work, people can munch.

Plus, it gives a solemn air to the proceedings. Nobody's talking in a loud voice in the church. No ranting. No arguing. Just whispers - how's your sister, I saw our friend Bob the other day, how old is your baby - of a community being a community while sharing time to make a national decision. Voting today was one of the most hopeful experiences I've had relating to this campaign.

Tuesday November 2, 2004 at 6:16am

Go Vote

Or, in the memorable words of sixth grader
Kirby Crowley:

I'm tired of your lame excuses: Get out and vote

The presidential election is today. Voting is a constitutional right and many people have died to protect this important right. But, still many adults don't vote and give lame excuses as to why they can't.

...there is no good reason not to vote. If you choose not to vote, you are just fooling yourself. All adults can vote; all adults should vote. There is no test to pass, there is no fee to pay, and there is no reason not to vote.



Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Tuesday November 2, 2004 at 6:16am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Monday November 1, 2004 at 5:04pm

When Will We Know The Result of the Election? (Reprised)

From Daily Kos, Last Friday

When Will Americans Know Which Candidate Is Elected as President?
· Wednesday, November 3rd 73%
· Between November 4th and November 10th 16%
· Between November 11th and December 1st 4%
· Later than December 1st But Before January 20th, 2005 2%
· After January 20th 4%


I'm still not feeling good about a final resoultion happening before November 11th. Just so damn close, by appearances at least.
Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday November 1, 2004 at 5:04pm | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Monday November 1, 2004 at 8:40am

How Does Jon Stewart Play It Tonight?

So, it's the last night for pre-election biting commentary from Stewart and the crew at The Daily Show. I'm wondering if this will be his highest rated show of the year, at least until tomorrow.

I'm sure they've been saving some classics for tomorrow's show, but they still have a show to do tonight.

And it's important what they hit, since their viewing is higher than evening CNN and MSNBC programming.

I hope he picks up on the Bush campaign "glee" about the OBL video. I could see a Rob Corrdry homerun with that story.

Whatever it is, please, make it a laugh-your-ass-off-kick-Bush's-ass-athon. Bite the power!

Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday November 1, 2004 at 8:40am | Permalink | 1 Comments |

Monday November 1, 2004 at 6:27am

Chicagoization of the Country

From AP

An untold number of ballots from people who have died since casting them will be counted this year because of the haphazard and cumbersome process of enforcing laws in many states to weed out these votes.

With millions of voters taking advantage of new, in-person early voting in at least 30 states this year, it's even more likely that such "ghost" votes will be counted because, in most cases, those ballots are impossible to retrieve. Besides, it could be days or weeks after the election before local officials get word someone has died.

Earlier this month, in what would be her last conscious act, 90-year-old Trixie Porter gripped a pen in her weak, trembling hand, checked the candidates of her choice and scrawled a squiggled signature on her absentee ballot.

Within an hour, the petite woman who had been suffering from heart problems lay back in her hospital bed, closed her eyes and never woke up. Her ballot arrived at her local elections board two days later, Oct. 5 - the day she died.


Before you think that this may not be an issue, consider this:

In Florida alone, more than 1.8 million people, many of them elderly and sick retirees, have cast absentee ballots or voted early in person in the past two weeks.

How many of those voters won't be alive on Election Day? Considering that an average of 455 voting-age people die in Florida every day, and that the 2000 presidential election was decided by a mere 537 votes, dead votes that slip through the cracks could become a meaningful bloc.


This country has to get serious about election reform, and not by adding layers and layers of new ways to vote. Simplify.




Posted by PSoTD
Posted on Monday November 1, 2004 at 6:27am | Permalink | 1 Comments |